So why have the racists "Art Deco" and "honestjohn" invaded sci.chem? Was it
getting too slimy under their rock?
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
-
Recent Posts
- I was connecting readings to middle-class Roxanna, who's concentrating over the text's evening.
- Older Arctic sea ice replaced by young, thin ice, says CU-Boulder study
- synthetic apatite providers
- Einstein grins at Uncle Al Schwartz
- Chirality died on Uncle Al Schwartz
- Negative chiral Festivus for Uncle Al Schwartz
- Re: Bible – Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3" yEnc (02/10)
- Re: Bible – Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3" yEnc (04/10)
- Re: Bible – Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3" yEnc (05/10)
- Re: Carman – The Standard Carman – Who's in the House.mp3" yEnc (22/22)


"Lloyd Parker" <lpar…@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:enbfio$qgt$5@leto.cc.emory.edu…
> So why have the racists "Art Deco" and "honestjohn" invaded sci.chem? Was
> it
> getting too slimy under their rock
We should all remember…….
Do not, repeat NOT, under any circumstances, respond to them unless they
post something to do with Chemistry.
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> So why have the racists "Art Deco" and "honestjohn" invaded sci.chem? Was it
> getting too slimy under their rock?
So write a filter that blocks crossposts to and from crackpot Usenet
groups. You’ll never even notice them … unless someone starts a
thread just for them, like you have for instance.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=-%22alt%22+-%22Dead+Paul%22+...
"Lloyd Parker" <lpar…@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:enbfio$qgt$5@leto.cc.emory.edu…
> So why have the racists "Art Deco" and "honestjohn"
> invaded sci.chem?
> Was it getting too slimy under their rock?
[hanson]
…. shshshhhhh…, not so loud about that, Lloyd…. ahahaha…
You know glasshouse/stone… pot/kettle… goose/gander.
Lloyd, racism is pancultural, practiced everywhere, especially
by Jews…. Don’t be so phonily PC now…..ahahahaha…
To boot, since YOU checked for the slime YOU must have
given or been the cause for these 2 juvee homo beat-off
artists "Fart Gecko" and "john, the john" to get their rocks off.
OTOH you have "raconte" aka "rac-ist cunt", a self-anointed
little green idiot on your side, AHAHA… ahaha… AHAHAHA…
Happy New Year, Lloyd! — … Have fun and laugh more!…
ahahaha… ahahahanson
PS: racunte, the class 3 enviro, who don’t know shit about chem
is still mad and embarrassed over these ones here… ahahaha…
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/a88071282e6b308b
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/a09301db905349b3
AHAHAHAHA…. Raconte, listen well. This is for your benefit:
Modern, attributal definitions of enviro classifications:
========= enviro Class (1) — the Green shit(s):
…are the ones who advocate, promote, support, legalize,
institute and extort the permit charges, the user fees, the
enviro surtaxes and the CO2/Carbon tax, all reflected in
HIGHER PRICES of goods and services!, …and being
responsible for much of the OUT-SOURCING!
========= enviro Class (2) — the Green turd(s):
… are the ones who are recipients and beneficiaries from
the lootings of (1), directly or indirectly.
========= enviro Class (3) — the Little green idiot(s):
.. are the unpaid, well-meaning ones who think they do
something for the "environment", when in fact they are only
the enablers and facilitators for (2) who are harvesting the
green $$$ that (1) has extorted.
In article <MPwmh.542971$1T2.537043@pd7urf2no>,
"//// Owen \\\\\\\\" <mo…@shaw.ca> wrote:
>"Lloyd Parker" <lpar…@emory.edu> wrote in message
>news:enbfio$qgt$5@leto.cc.emory.edu…
>> So why have the racists "Art Deco" and "honestjohn" invaded sci.chem? Was
>> it
>> getting too slimy under their rock
>We should all remember…….
>Do not, repeat NOT, under any circumstances, respond to them unless they
>post something to do with Chemistry.
I just respond to their ISP at the "abuse to" address.