<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chemistry and related sciences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allchemistry.info/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allchemistry.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I was connecting readings to middle-class Roxanna, who&#039;s concentrating over the text&#039;s evening.</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/i-was-connecting-readings-to-middle-class-roxanna-whos-concentrating-over-the-texts-evening</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/i-was-connecting-readings-to-middle-class-roxanna-whos-concentrating-over-the-texts-evening#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[139 LocalRules &#160; &#160; &#160;344 LoginDlg.cc &#160; &#160; &#160; 65 LoginDlg.h &#160; &#160; &#160;221 MacroRules &#160; &#160; &#160; 87 Makefile &#160; &#160; &#160;619 OASYSMain.cc &#160; &#160; &#160;175 OASYSMain.h &#160; &#160; &#160; 79 SubApp.cc &#160; &#160; &#160; 51 SubApp.h &#160; &#160; &#160; 54 gui_main.cc &#160; &#160; &#160; 33 gui_main.h &#160; &#160; &#160; 42 lib_inc &#160; &#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>139 LocalRules <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;344 LoginDlg.cc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 65 LoginDlg.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;221 MacroRules <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 87 Makefile <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;619 OASYSMain.cc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;175 OASYSMain.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 79 SubApp.cc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 51 SubApp.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 54 gui_main.cc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 33 gui_main.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 42 lib_inc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;647 sbOfLogin.cc <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;113 sbOfLogin.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0 sun4_4 <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 22 version.txt <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0 lib_inc/*.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;128 lib_inc/AccountBalance.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 22 lib_inc/AccountBalanceTest.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 59 lib_inc/AccrlInptTb.h <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 86 lib_inc/ArrClasT.h <br /> [snip of 247 lines] <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp;38696 total <br /> 
<p>********** end excerpt from &#8216;Corruption at Salomon Brothers&#8217; **********  </p>
<p>Another major category of security incidents are what I&#8217;ve named:  </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; o Dumb-and-Dumber  </p>
<p>********** begin excerpt from &#8216;Corruption at Salomon Brothers&#8217; **********  </p>
<p>-   &#8212;   -</p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp;Date: Thu, 23 May 96 11:52:04 EDT <br /> &gt; &nbsp;From: guy <br /> &gt; &nbsp;To: vivian [Salomon lawyer to whom I reported] <br /> &gt; &nbsp;Subject: Snarf: Two Redhots May 21/22 1996 <br /> &gt; &nbsp;Cc: mon_c <br /> 
<p>&gt; &nbsp;Vivian,  </p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp;Redhot #1)  </p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: ********************************* <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: Filename: &nbsp;May_21_96/dfAA12846 &nbsp; Size: 59853, &nbsp;Dated: &nbsp;May 21 &nbsp;07:08 <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: From: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;someone@sbixxx (Lara M.) <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: Recipient: nnnnnn&#8230;.@CompuServe.COM <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: Subject: &nbsp; Re: Can You? <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: *********************************  </p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Lara M. sent 1900 lines of C++ source to ex-SBI consultant Roger Rogers, <br /> &gt; &nbsp;at his request. (One of numerous instances of SBI people doing such).  </p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;The full transmission is enclosed.  </p>
<p>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Name &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: &nbsp;ReconGen.cc <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Name &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: &nbsp;ReconGen::ReconGen() <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Name &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: &nbsp;LogError <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Name &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: &nbsp;processQuery <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Name &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/i-was-connecting-readings-to-middle-class-roxanna-whos-concentrating-over-the-texts-evening/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Older Arctic sea ice replaced by young, thin ice, says CU-Boulder study</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/older-arctic-sea-ice-replaced-by-young-thin-ice-says-cu-boulder-study</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/older-arctic-sea-ice-replaced-by-young-thin-ice-says-cu-boulder-study#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study by University of Colorado at Boulder researchers indicates older, multi-year sea ice in the Arctic is giving way to younger, thinner ice, making it more susceptible to record summer sea-ice lows like the one that occurred in 2007. http://www.theanalystmagazine.com/pr/6782626.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study by University of Colorado at Boulder researchers indicates <br /> older, multi-year sea ice in the Arctic is giving way to younger, <br /> thinner ice, making it more susceptible to record summer sea-ice lows <br /> like the one that occurred in 2007. <br /> 
<p>http://www.theanalystmagazine.com/pr/6782626.htm </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/older-arctic-sea-ice-replaced-by-young-thin-ice-says-cu-boulder-study/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>synthetic apatite providers</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/synthetic-apatite-providers</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/synthetic-apatite-providers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I need an apatite sample with a very flat surface and I think the only way to obtain it is to buy from a company that is able to synthetise apatite. do you know where could I buy that sort of apatite? Thank you, Andrea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I need an apatite sample with a very flat surface and I think the <br /> only way to obtain it is to buy from a company that is able to <br /> synthetise apatite. do you know where could I buy that sort of <br /> apatite? <br /> 
<p>Thank you, <br /> Andrea </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/synthetic-apatite-providers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Einstein grins at Uncle Al Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/einstein-grins-at-uncle-al-schwartz</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/einstein-grins-at-uncle-al-schwartz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. &#34;Uncle Al&#34; &#60;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&#62; wrote in news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that &#34;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &#34; [hanson] &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &#160;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. &quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in <br /> news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> 
<p>Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY <br /> &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that  </p>
<p>&quot;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly <br /> well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &quot; </p>
<p>[hanson] <br /> &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &nbsp;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: <br /> At least you tried and that is more than can be said <br /> about all the others who just spread new theories <br /> by pontificating Einstein gedanken XP analogs. </p>
<p>For your fanatical efforts you get # 4 &quot;attaboy&quot; like <br /> one each for your other prior failures, starting with <br /> (1) your cockroach repellent that you couldn&#8217;t sell, <br /> (2) your pound sized gem quality diamonds which <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; have &nbsp;yet to materialize and <br /> (3) your quartz ball Eotvoes xp that was proxyied <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;by the Chinese but turned out too left-handed. </p>
<p>Now, let us in on WHY your Benzil gig/gag failed. <br /> Don&#8217;t just hide your efforts&#8230;. Reporting sci-failure is <br /> like reporting crimes. &#8212; &nbsp;It has its positive value. <br /> There is no shame in that&#8230; only a bit of embarrassment. <br /> But that is due to your characteristic loud-mouthing&#8230; <br /> which is highly entertaining.. even if nothing else&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; after all you wrote in these and other posts <br /> news:47753AB6.3DBE5ABA@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> news:47608C08.5725B77B@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> that <br /> ::Al:: 2a) General Relativity is falsified &#8230;. <br /> ::Al:: 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified&#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified &#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a <br /> ::Al:: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, <br /> ::Al:: and it all happens at the founding postulate level without <br /> ::Al:: contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. <br /> ::Al:: &#8230; the [Benzil Calorimerty] experiment can do no worse <br /> ::Al:: than fail. &nbsp;&#8212; &nbsp;Festivus &#8211; for the rest of us. </p>
<p>So, keep at it, Al, for the sake of Festivus&#8230; ahahaha&#8230; <br /> Thanks for the laughs, Al&#8230; &nbsp;ahahaha&#8230; ahahahanson </p>
<p>&#8212;- Here&#8217;s were Schwartz was hiding his announcement &#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212; and his disappointment and embarrassment &nbsp;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212;- &nbsp;under a cloak of curses &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  </p>
<p>&quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; </p>
<p>Dr. Henri Wilson&quot; &lt;HW@&#8230;.&gt; wrote in message <br /> news:k7jlo3pfsoti8atsd1vsj2gd2l9du12g21@4ax.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>-   &#8212;   -</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; So you see there is little difference in the two approaches. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; If BaTh is wrong, then so is SR. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR however does not take into account the doppler shift <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; that always occurs in a frame change. SR also requires <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; fairies to make light speed = c in all frames. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR is approximate only, requiring that v&lt;&lt;c. <br /> 
<p>&gt; Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt;&gt;[snip crap] <br /> &gt;&gt;Lying bastard. <br /> &gt;&gt;Empirical idiot, <br /> &gt;&gt;&lt;http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments&#8230;.&gt; <br /> &gt;&gt; Experimental constraints on Special Relativity  </p>
<p>&gt; Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) <br /> &gt; Fucking moron. If Einstein&#8217;s relativity is so fucking good, why <br /> &gt; the hell are people still trying to find supporting evidence for it?  </p>
<p>&gt; A. Because it&#8217;s crap from start to finish&#8230; <br /> &gt; www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm <br /> &gt; Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating <br /> &gt; frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating <br /> &gt; frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?  </p>
<p>Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt; Enpirical tests seek falsificaiton, you hopeless jackass. &nbsp;You know <br /> &gt; nothing about science. &nbsp;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are <br /> &gt; astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter <br /> &gt; case. &nbsp;Theory vs. prediction is perfect within experimental error in <br /> &gt; all venues at scales in all cases at all times.  </p>
<p>&gt; Nothing you have posted in the past decade rises above swamp <br /> &gt; mud. &nbsp;You are an ignorant petulant boring ineducable little boy. <br /> &gt; Fuck you.  </p>
<p>&gt; Uncle Al <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ <br /> &gt; (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/einstein-grins-at-uncle-al-schwartz/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chirality died on Uncle Al Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/chirality-died-on-uncle-al-schwartz</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/chirality-died-on-uncle-al-schwartz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. &#34;Uncle Al&#34; &#60;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&#62; wrote in news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that &#34;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &#34; [hanson] &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &#160;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. &quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in <br /> news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> 
<p>Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY <br /> &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that  </p>
<p>&quot;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly <br /> well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &quot; </p>
<p>[hanson] <br /> &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &nbsp;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: <br /> At least you tried and that is more than can be said <br /> about all the others who just spread new theories <br /> by pontificating Einstein gedanken XP analogs. </p>
<p>For your fanatical efforts you get # 4 &quot;attaboy&quot; like <br /> one each for your other prior failures, starting with <br /> (1) your cockroach repellent that you couldn&#8217;t sell, <br /> (2) your pound sized gem quality diamonds which <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; have &nbsp;yet to materialize and <br /> (3) your quartz ball Eotvoes xp that was proxyied <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;by the Chinese but turned out too left-handed. </p>
<p>Now, let us in on WHY your Benzil gig/gag failed. <br /> Don&#8217;t just hide your efforts&#8230;. Reporting sci-failure is <br /> like reporting crimes. &#8212; &nbsp;It has its positive value. <br /> There is no shame in that&#8230; only a bit of embarrassment. <br /> But that is due to your characteristic loud-mouthing&#8230; <br /> which is highly entertaining.. even if nothing else&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; after all you wrote in these and other posts <br /> news:47753AB6.3DBE5ABA@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> news:47608C08.5725B77B@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> that <br /> ::Al:: 2a) General Relativity is falsified &#8230;. <br /> ::Al:: 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified&#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified &#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a <br /> ::Al:: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, <br /> ::Al:: and it all happens at the founding postulate level without <br /> ::Al:: contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. <br /> ::Al:: &#8230; the [Benzil Calorimerty] experiment can do no worse <br /> ::Al:: than fail. &nbsp;&#8212; &nbsp;Festivus &#8211; for the rest of us. </p>
<p>So, keep at it, Al, for the sake of Festivus&#8230; ahahaha&#8230; <br /> Thanks for the laughs, Al&#8230; &nbsp;ahahaha&#8230; ahahahanson </p>
<p>&#8212;- Here&#8217;s were Schwartz was hiding his announcement &#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212; and his disappointment and embarrassment &nbsp;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212;- &nbsp;under a cloak of curses &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  </p>
<p>&quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; </p>
<p>Dr. Henri Wilson&quot; &lt;HW@&#8230;.&gt; wrote in message <br /> news:k7jlo3pfsoti8atsd1vsj2gd2l9du12g21@4ax.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>-   &#8212;   -</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; So you see there is little difference in the two approaches. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; If BaTh is wrong, then so is SR. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR however does not take into account the doppler shift <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; that always occurs in a frame change. SR also requires <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; fairies to make light speed = c in all frames. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR is approximate only, requiring that v&lt;&lt;c. <br /> 
<p>&gt; Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt;&gt;[snip crap] <br /> &gt;&gt;Lying bastard. <br /> &gt;&gt;Empirical idiot, <br /> &gt;&gt;&lt;http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments&#8230;.&gt; <br /> &gt;&gt; Experimental constraints on Special Relativity  </p>
<p>&gt; Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) <br /> &gt; Fucking moron. If Einstein&#8217;s relativity is so fucking good, why <br /> &gt; the hell are people still trying to find supporting evidence for it?  </p>
<p>&gt; A. Because it&#8217;s crap from start to finish&#8230; <br /> &gt; www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm <br /> &gt; Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating <br /> &gt; frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating <br /> &gt; frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?  </p>
<p>Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt; Enpirical tests seek falsificaiton, you hopeless jackass. &nbsp;You know <br /> &gt; nothing about science. &nbsp;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are <br /> &gt; astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter <br /> &gt; case. &nbsp;Theory vs. prediction is perfect within experimental error in <br /> &gt; all venues at scales in all cases at all times.  </p>
<p>&gt; Nothing you have posted in the past decade rises above swamp <br /> &gt; mud. &nbsp;You are an ignorant petulant boring ineducable little boy. <br /> &gt; Fuck you.  </p>
<p>&gt; Uncle Al <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ <br /> &gt; (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/chirality-died-on-uncle-al-schwartz/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negative chiral Festivus for Uncle Al Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/negative-chiral-festivus-for-uncle-al-schwartz</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/negative-chiral-festivus-for-uncle-al-schwartz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. &#34;Uncle Al&#34; &#60;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&#62; wrote in news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that &#34;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &#34; [hanson] &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &#160;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. &quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in <br /> news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> 
<p>Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY <br /> &#8212; coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP &#8212;, that  </p>
<p>&quot;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly <br /> well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter case. &quot; </p>
<p>[hanson] <br /> &#8230; ahahaha&#8230; &nbsp;So, Al, first the praise and the prize: <br /> At least you tried and that is more than can be said <br /> about all the others who just spread new theories <br /> by pontificating Einstein gedanken XP analogs. </p>
<p>For your fanatical efforts you get # 4 &quot;attaboy&quot; like <br /> one each for your other prior failures, starting with <br /> (1) your cockroach repellent that you couldn&#8217;t sell, <br /> (2) your pound sized gem quality diamonds which <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; have &nbsp;yet to materialize and <br /> (3) your quartz ball Eotvoes xp that was proxyied <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;by the Chinese but turned out too left-handed. </p>
<p>Now, let us in on WHY your Benzil gig/gag failed. <br /> Don&#8217;t just hide your efforts&#8230;. Reporting sci-failure is <br /> like reporting crimes. &#8212; &nbsp;It has its positive value. <br /> There is no shame in that&#8230; only a bit of embarrassment. <br /> But that is due to your characteristic loud-mouthing&#8230; <br /> which is highly entertaining.. even if nothing else&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; after all you wrote in these and other posts <br /> news:47753AB6.3DBE5ABA@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> news:47608C08.5725B77B@hate.spam.net&#8230; <br /> that <br /> ::Al:: 2a) General Relativity is falsified &#8230;. <br /> ::Al:: 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified&#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified &#8230; <br /> ::Al:: 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a <br /> ::Al:: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, <br /> ::Al:: and it all happens at the founding postulate level without <br /> ::Al:: contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. <br /> ::Al:: &#8230; the [Benzil Calorimerty] experiment can do no worse <br /> ::Al:: than fail. &nbsp;&#8212; &nbsp;Festivus &#8211; for the rest of us. </p>
<p>So, keep at it, Al, for the sake of Festivus&#8230; ahahaha&#8230; <br /> Thanks for the laughs, Al&#8230; &nbsp;ahahaha&#8230; ahahahanson </p>
<p>&#8212;- Here&#8217;s were Schwartz was hiding his announcement &#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212; and his disappointment and embarrassment &nbsp;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8212;&#8212;- &nbsp;under a cloak of curses &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  </p>
<p>&quot;Uncle Al&quot; &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:478B90F7.E65B512@hate.spam.net&#8230; </p>
<p>Dr. Henri Wilson&quot; &lt;HW@&#8230;.&gt; wrote in message <br /> news:k7jlo3pfsoti8atsd1vsj2gd2l9du12g21@4ax.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>-   &#8212;   -</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; So you see there is little difference in the two approaches. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; If BaTh is wrong, then so is SR. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR however does not take into account the doppler shift <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; that always occurs in a frame change. SR also requires <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; fairies to make light speed = c in all frames. <br /> &gt;&gt;&gt; SR is approximate only, requiring that v&lt;&lt;c. <br /> 
<p>&gt; Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt;&gt;[snip crap] <br /> &gt;&gt;Lying bastard. <br /> &gt;&gt;Empirical idiot, <br /> &gt;&gt;&lt;http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments&#8230;.&gt; <br /> &gt;&gt; Experimental constraints on Special Relativity  </p>
<p>&gt; Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) <br /> &gt; Fucking moron. If Einstein&#8217;s relativity is so fucking good, why <br /> &gt; the hell are people still trying to find supporting evidence for it?  </p>
<p>&gt; A. Because it&#8217;s crap from start to finish&#8230; <br /> &gt; www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm <br /> &gt; Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating <br /> &gt; frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating <br /> &gt; frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?  </p>
<p>Uncle Al &lt;Uncle&#8230;@hate.spam.net&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt; Enpirical tests seek falsificaiton, you hopeless jackass. &nbsp;You know <br /> &gt; nothing about science. &nbsp;Both Relativity and quantum field theory are <br /> &gt; astoundingly well tested &#8211; to 14 significant figures in the latter <br /> &gt; case. &nbsp;Theory vs. prediction is perfect within experimental error in <br /> &gt; all venues at scales in all cases at all times.  </p>
<p>&gt; Nothing you have posted in the past decade rises above swamp <br /> &gt; mud. &nbsp;You are an ignorant petulant boring ineducable little boy. <br /> &gt; Fuck you.  </p>
<p>&gt; Uncle Al <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ <br /> &gt; (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) <br /> &gt; http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/negative-chiral-festivus-for-uncle-al-schwartz/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Bible &#8211; Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3&quot; yEnc (02/10)</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0210</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0210#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and are become the holy and happy children of the King of kings? And let every one that is yet out of Christ, and hanging over the pit of hell, whether they be old men and women, or middle aged, or young people, or little children, now hearken to the loud calls of God&#8217;s word [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and are become the holy and happy children of the King of <br /> kings? <br /> 
<p>And let every one that is yet out of Christ, and hanging over the pit of <br /> hell, whether they be old men and women, or middle aged, or young <br /> people, or little children, now hearken to the loud calls of God&#8217;s word <br /> and providence. This acceptable year of the Lord, a day of such great <br /> favour to some, will doubtless be a day of as remarkable vengeance to <br /> others. Men&#8217;s hearts harden, and their guilt increases apace at such a <br /> day as this, if they neglect their souls; and never was there so great <br /> danger of such persons being given up to hardness of heart and blindness <br /> of mind. God seems now to be hastily gathering in his elect in all parts <br /> of the land; and probably the greater part of adult persons that ever <br /> shall be saved, will be brought in now in a little time, and that it <br /> will be as it was on the great out-pouring of the Spirit upon the Jews <br /> in the apostles&#8217; days; the election will obtain, and the rest will be <br /> blinded. If this should be the case with you, you will eternally curse <br /> this day, and will curse the day that ever you was born, to see such a <br /> season of the pouring out of God&#8217;s Spirit, and wi </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0210/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Bible &#8211; Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3&quot; yEnc (04/10)</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0410</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0410#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in Isaiah. &#34;God must fulfil His promises,&#34; etc. Men owe it to God to accept the religion which He sends. God owes it to men not to lead them into error. Now, they would be led into error, if the workers of miracles announced a doctrine which should not appear evidently false to the light [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in Isaiah. <br /> 
<p>&quot;God must fulfil His promises,&quot; etc.  </p>
<p>Men owe it to God to accept the religion which He sends. God owes it to men <br /> not to lead them into error. Now, they would be led into error, if the <br /> workers of miracles announced a doctrine which should not appear evidently <br /> false to the light of common sense, and if a greater worker of miracles had <br /> not already wamed men not to believe them.  </p>
<p>Thus, if there were divisions in the Church, and the Arians, for example, <br /> who declared themselves founded on Scripture just as the Catholics, had done <br /> miracles, and not the Catholics, men should have been led into error.  </p>
<p>For, as a man, who announces to us the secrets of God, is not worthy to be <br /> believed on his private authority, and that is why the ungodly doubt him; so <br /> when a man, as a token of the communion which he has with God, raises the <br /> dead, foretells the future, removes the seas, heals the sick, there is none <br /> so wicked as not to bow to him, and the incredulity of Pharaoh and the <br /> Pharisees is the effect of a supernatural obduracy.  </p>
<p>When, therefore, we see miracles and a doctrine not suspicious, both on one <br /> side, there is no difficulty. But when we see miracles and suspicious <br /> doctrine on the same side, we must then see which is the clearest. Jesus <br /> Christ was suspected.  </p>
<p>Bar-jesus blinded. The power of God surpasses that of His enemies.  </p>
<p>The Jewish exorcists beaten by the devils, saying, &quot;Jesus I know, and Paul I <br /> know; but who are ye&quot;?  </p>
<p>Miracles are for doctrine, and not doctrine for miracles.  </p>
<p>If the miracles are true, shall we be able to persuade men of all doctrine? <br /> No; for this will not come to pass. Si angelus&#8230;[208]  </p>
<p>Rule: we must judge of doctrine by miracles; we must judge of miracles by <br /> doctrine. All this is true, but contains no contradiction.  </p>
<p>For we must distinguish the times.  </p>
<p>How glad you are to know the general rules, thinking thereby to set up <br /> dissension and render all useless </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0410/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Bible &#8211; Old Testament- New International version (NIV) Dramatized.audio 039 Malachi.mp3&quot; yEnc (05/10)</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0510</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0510#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we have been the freest of any part of the land from unhappy divisions and quarrels in our ecclesiastical and religious affairs, till the late lamentable Springfield contention. [The Springfield Contention relates to the settlement of a minister there, which occasioned too warm debates between some, both pastors and people, that were for it, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have been the <br /> freest of any part of the land from unhappy divisions and quarrels in <br /> our ecclesiastical and religious affairs, till the late lamentable <br /> Springfield contention. [The Springfield Contention relates to the <br /> settlement of a minister there, which occasioned too warm debates <br /> between some, both pastors and people, that were for it, and others that <br /> were against it, on account of their different apprehensions about his <br /> principles, and about some steps that were taken to procure his <br /> ordination.] <br /> 
<p>Being much separated from other parts of the province and having <br /> comparatively but little intercourse with them, we have always managed <br /> our ecclesiastical affairs within ourselves. It is the way in which the <br /> country, from its infancy, has gone on, by the practical agreement of <br /> all; and the way in which our peace and good order has hitherto been <br /> maintained.  </p>
<p>The town of Northampton is of about 82 years standing, and has now about <br /> 200 families; which mostly dwell more compactly together than any town <br /> of such a size in these parts of the country. This probably has been an <br /> occasion, that both our corruptions and reformations have been, from <br /> time to time, the more swiftly propagated from one to another thr </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-bible-old-testament-new-international-version-niv-dramatized-audio-039-malachi-mp3-yenc-0510/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Carman &#8211; The Standard Carman &#8211; Who&#039;s in the House.mp3&quot; yEnc (22/22)</title>
		<link>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-carman-the-standard-carman-whos-in-the-house-mp3-yenc-2222</link>
		<comments>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-carman-the-standard-carman-whos-in-the-house-mp3-yenc-2222#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allchemistry.info/?p=3530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a thing that it is right that those who will not take the trouble to seek it, if it be obscure, should be deprived of it. Why, then, do any complain, if it be such as can be found by seeking? 575. All things work together for good to the elect, even the obscurities of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a thing that it is right that those <br /> who will not take the trouble to seek it, if it be obscure, should be <br /> deprived of it. Why, then, do any complain, if it be such as can be found by <br /> seeking? <br /> 
<p>575. All things work together for good to the elect, even the obscurities of <br /> Scripture; for they honour them because of what is divinely clear. And all <br /> things work together for evil to the rest of the world, even what is clear; <br /> for they revile such, because of the obscurities which they do not <br /> understand.  </p>
<p>576. The general conduct of the world towards the Church: God willing to <br /> blind and to enlighten.&#8211;The event having proved the divinity of these <br /> prophecies, the rest ought to be believed. And thereby we see the order of <br /> the world to be of this kind. The miracles of the Creation and the Deluge <br /> being forgotten, God sends the law and the miracles of Moses, the prophets <br /> who prophesied particular things; and to prepare a lasting miracle, He <br /> prepares prophecies and their fulfilment; but, as the prophecies could be <br /> suspected, He desires to make them above suspicion, etc.  </p>
<p>577. God has made the blindness of this people subservient to the good of <br /> the elect.  </p>
<p>578. There is sufficient clearness to enlighten the elect, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allchemistry.info/re-carman-the-standard-carman-whos-in-the-house-mp3-yenc-2222/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

