Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
Ideas welcome!
JS


Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
Ideas welcome!
JS







Dear Null:
"Null" <da…@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1160144506.804025.128330@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com…
> Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
> http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
> Ideas welcome!
The chicken and egg question is to differentiate between a
creationist and an evolutionist.
Which came first? The chicken of course! Eggs don’t have sex.
(Think about it…)
David A. Smith
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:n…@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:T%EVg.1954$v43.500@fed1read02…
> Dear Null:
> "Null" <da…@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:1160144506.804025.128330@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com…
>> Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
>> http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
>> Ideas welcome!
> The chicken and egg question is to differentiate between a creationist and
> an evolutionist.
> Which came first? The chicken of course! Eggs don’t have sex. (Think
> about it…)
But do chickens have orgasms?
Reminds me of a cartoon I saw a few years ago. A rooster and an (obviously
female) egg are laying in bed in a post-coital glow. The rooster is smoking
a cigarette looking satisfied, and the egg is laying there looking annoyed
and frustrated, saying "Well, I guess we know the answer to *that* old
question."
Eric Lucas
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:18:14 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
dlzc1 D:cox T:n…@nospam.com> wrote:
>Dear Null:
>"Null" <da…@excite.com> wrote in message
>news:1160144506.804025.128330@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com…
>> Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
>> http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
>> Ideas welcome!
>The chicken and egg question is to differentiate between a
>creationist and an evolutionist.
>Which came first? The chicken of course! Eggs don’t have sex.
>(Think about it…)
>David A. Smith
they do, but they only get laid once.
Dear lucasea:
<luca…@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:cmGVg.11943$6S3.4461@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:n…@nospam.com>
> wrote in message news:T%EVg.1954$v43.500@fed1read02…
>> Dear Null:
>> "Null" <da…@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160144506.804025.128330@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com…
>>> Which came first? Or perhaps what laid this!
>>> http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/interactive/caption-competition
>>> Ideas welcome!
>> The chicken and egg question is to differentiate between
>> a creationist and an evolutionist.
>> Which came first? The chicken of course! Eggs don’t
>> have sex. (Think about it…)
> But do chickens have orgasms?
I would think that some internal reactions we would recognize
causes the rooster to embark on the act, and the chicken to hold
still for it.
> Reminds me of a cartoon I saw a few years ago. A
> rooster and an (obviously female) egg are laying in
> bed in a post-coital glow. The rooster is smoking a cigarette
> looking satisfied, and the egg is laying
> there looking annoyed and frustrated, saying "Well,
> I guess we know the answer to *that* old question."
A classic.
David A. Smith